MINISTRY

OUR MINISTER

INTERN MINISTERS

LAY CHAPLAINS

SERMON ARCHIVE

 

A collection of sermons to describe our sometimes hard to pin down faith

Click here

 

Lucky Me!

Reverend Brian J. Kiely, Unitarian Church of Edmonton, February 9, 2003

Why is it that I am not some Iraqi fruit vendor, selling spoiled produce, trying to keep my family alive, living under the threat of repression for speaking my discontent, all the while waiting for the bombs to drop? Why is it that I get to live in one of the very best countries in the world with a reasonable degree of freedom, a good lifestyle, a happy marriage, rather too much to eat and no worries for my safety when I go to sleep at night?

Did I actually do something right to deserve this? Of course not, no more than that poor Iraqi fruit vendor has done anything wrong. The only difference between us is that I got lucky and he didn't.

As I thought more and more about this idea of good fortune, a topic suggested by a church member, I realized that it is a variation on one of the oldest questions in human existence: the question of meaning. Why? Why am I here? Was I put here for a purpose? Is some great unseen power watching out for me... and watching me? Why has this good or bad thing happened to me?

It probably says something about human nature that few philosophers have written about this question from a positive angle. Most, starting with the author of Job, have gone the other route, trying to come up with a divine explanation for apparently random bad things that befall us.

It's a bit of an intellectual trap. You see philosophers and theologians and tribal shamans are devoted to making sense of the unseen. They construct systems to explain every act, whether human or natural. They are unwilling or unable to accept capriciousness or randomness. Everything has to have a reason. Over the centuries they have come up with some odd theories. They mostly start with a belief that some deity or deities rule events in our lives. The hunt failed because we performed our rituals incorrectly. You are sick because you have displeased your God. Or my favorite, this half of the room goes to heaven because God decided it before creation began and the rest of you are out of luck...bring sunscreen.

Stuff happens, they say, so there has to be a logical explanation. Except, there often is no such explanation.

I recently reread Rabbi Harold Kushner's excellent little book "When Bad Things Happen to Good People". He wrote the book after his own son's tragic death. Kushner understands that theology is to a degree a "game" . He also understands that theology only presents unreal models. He sought a human answer in his library, not a theological one, but could not find it. Kushner wrote:
" The books I turned to were more concerned with God's honor - with logical proof that bad is really good and that evil is necessary to make this a good world, than they were with curing the bewilderment and anguish of the parent of a dying child. They had answers for all their own questions, but not for mine." (p.4) As he adds much later, 'Why is God doing this to me?' is not a theological question, but a cry of pain."

In the same way, "How did I get to be so lucky?" is not that start of an intellectual search, but a cry of exultation.

We don't quietly say, "Why is this happening to me?" in a calm and rational way...No we shout out, "WHY IS THIS HAPPENING TO ME?" in joy or anguish. People wrestle with this because of some event that has happened to them or a loved one. It's not an explanation they seek, or even advice on how to proceed. What they want, what we want is comfort in times of sorrow, companionship in times of joy and reassurance that we are good people.

Much of the time there is no real answer to give. I can't explain why a child has a failing heart, why this person got cancer while that one did not. It seems so unjust, so random, so unfair. We humans don't like not having answers. As Kushner wrote, "Some people cannot handle the idea (of randomness) they look for connections, striving desperately to make sense of all that happens. They convince themselves that God is cruel, or that they are sinners, rather than accept randomness." (p46-7)

The same is true when good things happen. Athletes thank God for victory, for the goal that went in, for the pass they intercepted. Highly successful people in many fields hold that their success was 'meant to be'. Even in love, we meet someone with whom we are compatible and believe we were drawn together by irresistible forces, when in reality it could well have been an accident of fate.

Randomness is as good an explanation as any, but it's not really satisfying. You can't blame or celebrate randomness, you can't hate it or love it, you can't rail against it. Even the idea of God targeting you for some bad thing at least means you can hate God, or possibly blame yourself for your own misfortune. When our worlds are falling apart in an irrational crisis, we want to find a rational anchor. We seek answers and explanations if only to help us feel like we still have some grasp of reality. The kinds of answers we find vary greatly.

In ancient times the people lived tribally subject to the vagaries of weather and roving bands of marauders. They saw the natural world as a place where good and evil did battle and where there was no guarantee of good winning. When bad was ahead in the cosmic conflict, then people died, or crops withered. When good was dominant, then harvests were good, weather was kind. Being caught between good and evil like a farmer in a war zone is one explanation. We are not at fault, we're just caught in situations we cannot control.

In a more stable culture where there was a rule of law imposed by a monarch, a different understanding of good and evil evolved. People stopped seeing themselves as mere bystanders in this cosmic struggle and began to envision divine beings as kingly figures who affected their lives. Our ancestors began to think that if they behaved in certain ways, they would appease the gods and bring good fortune to the people. If they disobeyed, they were subject to punishment. Pleasing and placating the gods became important with formal rituals and elaborate sacrifices.

But they, too, noticed that some punishments were far too severe for any possible crimes. Their beliefs included the possibility of divine capriciousness and even gods who were mean spirited. Their gods weren't always moral or ethical in the way that Christians and Jews expect high standards from their god. The gods were capable of all sorts of mayhem and could strike someone down on a whim or out of sheer cussedness. But whether you deserved it or not, the things that befell you were caused by a god.

Many today still do believe that the bad things that happen in the world are punishment for some sin. Kushner tells of visiting a bereaved family whose young daughter had died of a brain aneurysm. The parents were racked with guilt, for they believed she died because they failed in their ritual fasting requirements that year. They honestly held that their daughter was punished for their sin. I wouldn't want to worship so petty and mean-spirited a deity, yet many people live their lives in fear because of such beliefs. It is their answer to why bad happens.

Most of us look at the world around us, see some pretty nasty people being successful in life and ask, "So where is their thunderbolt?" It's obvious to anyone who has spent anytime reading newspapers that there is not nearly as much justice in the world as there should be and that divine retribution is more notable for its absence than anything else. If God is watching over the day to day affairs of the world as some assert, then he's doing a pretty sloppy job!

"Ah, well", said the theologians, "God works in mysterious ways his wonders to perform." They say the world is still under development and that the divinity has to hurt some people in order to realize the ultimate plan. This plan is so vast that we mere mortals cannot comprehend its complexity. We have to believe that our misfortune will eventually lead to a greater good. Besides, all suffering is makes you better in God's eyes anyway, and you'll get your reward later. "Yah, but it sure hurts" comes the unsatisfied reply.

A fourth variation on suffering as divine punishment, is that suffering is good for us. We learn to correct our mistakes, our suffering gives a chance to change the course of our lives. You have all heard the phrase "No pain, no gain." A little hard work, a little pain was good for us. As the saying goes, "that which does not kill me makes me stronger."

I am sure you have gone through something painful in your life - a divorce, an illness, a bankruptcy - and found that you came out of it a person changed for the better, wiser, more appreciative of what you have. Some hard times can help us learn about ourselves and how better to make our way in the world...in seminary we used to rudely call such events by the acronym A.F.G.O. Another Flipping Growth Opportunity.

Well, all credit to the person who can gain new insights through their adversity, but as a theological doctrine, I can't accept it. Oh, the idea is fine for workouts and divorces and so on, but what is served when an innocent party suffers? Anyone who has watched a child dying knows that this is a ridiculous argument. There is nothing a child could do to deserve such treatment, and to suggest that God is killing the child to teach the parent a lesson is so unspeakably cruel that I can't even think about it. I find randomness a comforting thought here, for at least a random universe isn't deliberately inflicting pain.

Other traditions offer a few other explanations for the events in our lives: fate, karma, the balance of the universe, but you can see the essential point. Why things happen is finally not a question with a logical answer, so we humans have turned ask religion to project answers to give us some peace of mind. Sometimes it helps. Often it does not.

In the end there is a different issue we must face. What do we do with the good or ill fortune that befalls us?

About 17 years ago my roomate, Rev. Mark DeWolfe, contracted AIDS. He was a dear friend and the man who inspired me to go into the ministry. He was ill for about two years with the disease before his death. Although he had his days of denial and anger and self-recrimination, his lasting legacy is the way he faced his disease. Mark was a leading example of the phrase "living with AIDS" instead of dying from it. He became an outspoken advocate for AIDS patients and, because of his role of minister in our Mississaugua church, was able to show early on in the crisis that AIDS is a disease that strikes anywhere, even at the center of the church.

What happened to Mark was unfair, unjust and a terrible blow to, family, friends, his congregation and to Unitarianism in Canada. But his inspirational attitude was, "So what? I can't undo the fact that I have this disease, all I can do is what any of us has to do, live out my days as best I can making the best contribution I can make."

Mark and Rabbi Kushner agreed on this as they pondered how best to respond to the tragedies that befell them. Kushner says that we can redeem tragedy. We have to get past asking why the bad things happened and move on to: Now that this has happened, what am I going to do about it? How can I give my suffering meaning?

And Barbara Rhode in our reading gave an answer for the good things. When asked how skeptical UU's deal with miracles she wrote, "She does what all humans do in the presence of wonder. She gives thanks." Indeed. What else is there to do?



Back to Sermon Archive


About Us | Programs & Facilities | News & Events | Ministry | Administration |Denomination| Community | Links
Contact Us | Site Info | Sunday Services | Newsletter and Calendar

© 2004-07 THE UNITARIAN CHURCH OF EDMONTON—A Unitarian Universalist Community
10804 119 Street NW,  Edmonton AB, Canada T5H 3P2   Tel (780) 454-8073   Email chadmin@uce.ca
UCE Home Location Sunday Services Newsletter Site Info Contact Us About Us Programs & Facilities News & Events Ministry Governance & Administration Community Links The flaming chalice is a symbol of Unitarian Universalism. It is drawn from the history of the Christian Reformation in Czechoslovakia where Jan Hus asserted that all members of the congregation, and not only the priests, should be allowed to drink from the chalice at holy communion. Hus was burned at the stake for his efforts, but his followers persisted in building a church that believes in the "priesthood of all believers."